Ex Parte Adamczyk et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     



                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
             Ex parte ANDREW A. ADAMCZYK, CHRISTIAN THOMAS GORALSKI, JR.              
                                 and WILLIAM P. BOONE                                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2005-1236                                 
                              Application No. 10/065,796                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KIMLIN, PAK and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the         
          examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 25, which are all of         
          the claims pending in the above-identified application.                     
               According to appellants (Brief, page 3), ”[c]laims 1-25 stand          
          together.”  Therefore, for purposes of this appeal, we select claim         
          1 as representative of all the claims on appeal and decide the              


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007