Ex Parte Knoerzer et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-1318                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 10/191,198                                                                                  



                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellants' invention relates to product packaging and more particularly to                      
              providing packaging of a product, such as a snack food, in a stand-up pouch                                 
              (specification, p. 2).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                   
              the appellants' brief.                                                                                      


                     The rejections before us in this appeal are as follows:                                              
              (1) Claims 1 to 4, 6 to 9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over U.S.                      
              Patent No. 3,354,601 to Schneider et al. (Schneider) in view of U.S. Patent No.                             
              6,245,367 to Galomb; and                                                                                    
              (2) Claims 1 to 4, 6 to 9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                           
              Admitted Prior Art (APA) in view of Galomb.                                                                 


                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                        
              the appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answer                        
              (mailed June 24, 2004) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the                              
              rejections, and to the brief (filed April 28, 2004) and reply brief (filed August 11, 2004)                 
              for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.                                                                 










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007