Ex Parte Michlin et al - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2005-1349                                                                  Page 6                
              Application No. 10/079,686                                                                                  



                     reflective shields to reach desired performance for the required spectrum of                         
                     pulsations frequencies.                                                                              


                     In addition, in the background of the invention section of the application, the                      
              appellants teach that the majority of companies use two approaches to reduce                                
              pulsations in hydraulic systems.  The first approach consists in using a dampening                          
              element to absorb or damper pulsations in the flow.  The second approach consists in                        
              using the interference of 180-degree phase-shifted waves to reduce pulsations in a                          
              system.  The appellants state that Russian Pat. No. 626 304 discloses a dampener in                         
              which a phase-shifted wave is formed in a secondary channel of an interference disk.                        
              The present invention is said to be an advanced/improved modification of the previous                       
              dampener.                                                                                                   


                     In our view, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of                                  
              indefiniteness.  In fact, the examiner has not provided any rationale as to why the metes                   
              and bounds of the claimed invention are not set forth with a reasonable degree of                           
              precision and particularity when the language employed in the claims is analyzed in light                   
              of the teachings of the prior art and of the application's disclosure as it would be                        
              interpreted by one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the art.  All the examiner has                 









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007