Ex Parte Christ et al - Page 2

         Appeal No. 2005-1605                                                       
         Application No. 10/295,072                                                 

                   (c) hot melt coating the fibered bulk polymer                    
              onto a substrate to form a fibered adhesive layer.                    
              Claims 1-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being             
         obvious over Moon in view of Donermeyer or Röber.                          
              The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 1-22 as            
         being obvious over Moon in view of Aeling.                                 
              The examiner relies upon the following references as                  
         evidence of unpatentability:                                               
         Donermeyer et al.             4,219,460           Aug. 26, 1980            
         (Donermeyer)                 (Filed Oct. 04, 1978)                        
         Moon                        5,932,298           Aug. 03, 1999            
                                    (Filed Aug. 17, 1998)                        
         Röber                       EP 0796 906         Sep. 24, 1997            
         (Europe Patent Publication; English Translation)                           
              Appellants rely upon U.S. Patent 4,557,960 (Vernon), having           
         a date of publication of December 10, 1985.                                
              We consider claim 1 in this appeal.  See 37 CFR                       
         § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(September 13, 2004).  Also see Ex parte                 
         Schier, 21 USPQ2d 1016, 1018 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1991).                  
              We have carefully reviewed the appellants’ brief, the                 
         examiner’s answer, and the evidence of record.  This review has            
         led us to conclude that the rejection is well-founded.                     

                                    OPINION                                         
         I. 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 1-22 as being                       
              obvious over Moon in view of Donermeyer or Röber                      
              We refer to the examiner’s position set forth on pages                
         3-5 of the answer with regard to the rejection of claims                   
         1-22 as being obvious over Moon in view Donermeyer, or Moon                
         in view of Röber.                                                          


                                         2                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007