Ex Parte Cho et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2005-1608                                                                       Page 2                
               Application No. 10/424,327                                                                                       


                                                      INTRODUCTION                                                              
                      The claims are directed to a contactor.  According to the specification, contactors use a                 
               thin walled membrane to separate, via diffusion, gaseous, solid or liquid components from a                      
               solution or colloidal mixture (specification, p. 1).  Claim 1 illustrates the subject matter on                  
               appeal:                                                                                                          
                      1.  A contactor for degassing a liquid comprising:                                                        
                      a perforated core;                                                                                        
                      a pre-shrunk microporous membrane fabric wrapped around said core, said fabric                            
               comprising a polymethyl pentene hollow fiber weft and polyolefin warp yarn wherein the weft                      
               count is between 50 and 70 fibers per inch, the warp count is between 3 and 12 yarns per inch,                   
               and the warp yarn is finer than an 80 denier 40 filament yarn;                                                   
                      a tube sheet securing the ends of said fiber;                                                             
                      a shell encasing said tube sheet and fabric;                                                              
                      at least one opening in said shell to permit fluid flow through said shell; and                           
                      an end cap affixed to the shell.                                                                          
                      As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                          
               references:                                                                                                      
               Anazawa et al. (Anazawa)                     4,664,681                     May 12, 1987                          
               Akasu et al. (Akasu)                         4,911,846                     Mar. 27, 1990                         
                      Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Akasu                      
               in view of Anazawa.  As the claims are not separately argued, we consider them together.  We                     
               select claim 1 to represent the issues on appeal in accordance with 37 CFR                                       
               § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2004).                                                                                        
                      We affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject the claims for the following reasons.                         









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007