Ex Parte Mettrie et al - Page 4




               Appeal No. 2005-1655                                                                        Page 4                
               Application No. 09/852,624                                                                                        


                      Appellants argue that “there is no evidence of a reasonable expectation of success in                      
               combining Tomura and Lim and, further, there is no motivation to combine the references even                      
               if there was a reasonable expectation of success.” (Brief, p. 10).  We disagree for the following                 
               reasons.                                                                                                          
                      These arguments are based on the alleged unpredictability of adding additional                             
               ingredients to the polymer-alkali-uric acid system of Tomura.  Specifically, according to                         
               Appellants, the addition of further ingredients would unpredictably affect uric acid                              
               solubilization.  Appellants’ arguments are not supported by the evidence.  Namely, there is no                    
               convincing evidence that those of ordinary skill in the art would have understood acylsarcosinate                 
               and acylisethionate anionic surfactants, the surfactants taught by Lim as typically used in hair                  
               dyes, as having an adverse affect on the solubility of uric acid in the system of Tomura.  In fact,               
               Tomura indicates that, in addition to solubilization of the uric acid, in practice, it is necessary to            
               add surfactants and polymers to make the composition fit for use on hair and skin (col. 1, ll. 44-                
               50).1  Tomura is directed to providing a technique for stably solubilizing uric acid in an aqueous                
               cosmetic composition containing uric acid and a water-soluble polymer (col. 1, ll. 56-58).                        
               According to Tomura, it is the selection of the polymer in the uric acid and alkali system that is                


                      1We disagree with Appellants’ interpretation of column 1, lines 50-53 of Tomura as                         
               teaching that some surfactants are not satisfactory in solubilizing uric acid (Brief, p. 11).  That               
               paragraph is referring to the prior art and must be read in context with the rest of the disclosure.              
               There is no particular emphasis on surfactants as having an adverse affect on solubility in the                   
               disclosure of Tomura.  In fact, column 1, lines 45-59 indicate that the addition of surfactants is                
               necessary to make the composition useful for hair and skin application.                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007