Appeal No. 2005-1724
Application 09/758,127
Claims 92 and 94 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
being anticipated by Bastiani.
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Bastiani and Kobayashi.
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Bastiani and Kawamura.
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Bastiani and Kagle.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Bastiani and Kobayashi, further in view of
Official Notice that docking stations were well known.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Bastiani and Kawamura, further in view of
Official Notice that docking stations were well known.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Bastiani and Kagle, further in view of Official
Notice that docking stations were well known.
We refer to the final rejection (pages referred to as
"FR__") and the examiner's answer (pages referred to as "EA__")
for a statement of the examiner's rejection, and to the brief
(pages referred to as "Br__") and reply brief (pages referred to
as "RBr__") for a statement of appellants' arguments
thereagainst.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007