Ex Parte Badugu et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-1781                                                        
          Application No. 09/860,407                                                  

               promoting the representative in real time if the account               
          information satisfies the promotion parameters; and                         
               sending a payment based on the promotion to the                        
          representative if an assessment of a status associated with the             
          representative indicates that the representative qualifies for              
          the payment; and                                                            
               a customer interface accessible to the database for enabling           
          a customer associated with the representative to submit an                  
          application for a product or service, wherein the submission of             
          the application initiates the entry of the representative into              
          the queue.                                                                  
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Intel Press Release, Quixtar Inc. Creates A New Business Model              
          For The Internet Using Intel®-Architecture Based Servers, October           
          13, 2000 [Google](Intel).                                                   
          Quixtar Business Compendium, Quixtar Inc., 2000 [Google]                    
          (Quixtar).                                                                  
               Claims 11-15 and 28-34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Intel             
          in view of Quixtar.                                                         
               Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                  
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal,             
          the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence of                  
          obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the                  
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007