Ex Parte Foster et al - Page 10




             Appeal No. 2005-1833                                                        Page 10               
             Application No. 10/338,337                                                                        


                                                CONCLUSION                                                     
                   To summarize, the rejection of claims 23-27, 30, 32-34 and 39-42 as being                   
             anticipated by Castner is reversed as to claims 23-27, 30 and 32 and affirmed as to               
             claims 33, 34 and 39-42 and the rejection of claims 31 and 38 as being unpatentable               
             over Castner in view of Markey is reversed as to claim 31 and affirmed as to claim 38.            
             The examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.  A new rejection of claims 23-32 under 35            
             U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is entered pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b).                          
                   Regarding the affirmed rejection(s), 37 CFR § 41.52(a)(1) provides "[a]ppellant             
             may file a single request for rehearing within two months from the date of the original           
             decision of the Board."                                                                           
                   In addition to affirming the examiner's rejection(s) of one or more claims, this            
             decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b) (effective              
             September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office              
             21 (September 7, 2004)).  37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of rejection                 
             pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review."                    
                   37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS                      
             FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options                     
             with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the          
             rejected claims:                                                                                  
                          (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate amendment of the                      
                   claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or                   
                   both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event                      
                   the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007