Ex Parte Rodriguez et al - Page 10



          Appeal No. 2005-1942                                       Page 10          
          Application No. 10/173,938                                                  

               2a may have a positive dispersion (D+) characteristic                  
               and optical fiber 3a may have a negative dispersion (D-)               
               characteristic.  While traveling through a D+ optical                  
               fiber, an optical pulse signal stretches, thereby                      
               increasing its duration compared with the original                     
               optical signal.  On the other hand, while traveling                    
               through a D- optical fiber, the optical pulse is                       
               shortened, thereby decreasing its duration compared                    
               with the original optical signal.  Thus, by optically                  
               connecting suitable lengths of D+ and D- optical fibers                
               the net dispersion of a DMN can be manipulated to have a               
               relatively low net dispersion.                                         
                    However, a direct optical connection between optical              
               fibers having extremely different first and second                     
               dispersion characteristics can undesirably result in a                 
               relatively high splice loss.  For example, directly                    
               connecting D+ and D- optical fibers having MFDs of about               
               11.5:m and 6.0:m, respectively, results in a relatively high           
               splice loss.  To overcome this relatively high splice loss,            
               the DMNs of the present invention optically connect D+ and             
               D- optical fibers in a fiber optic cable closure with bridge           
               fiber 42 there between.  In one embodiment, the bridge fiber           
               acts as gradual change in MFD between the D+ and D- optical            
               fibers, thereby allowing for a relatively low splice loss.             
               Even though bridge fiber 42 has different optical                      
               characteristics than either the D+ and D- optical fibers,              
               the splice loss is advantageously reduced compared with a              
               direct D+ to D-splice.                                                 
               From this disclosure, and the lack of any support provided             
          by the examiner to support the examiner’s position, we find that            
          an artisan would have considered a bridge fiber to be an optical            
          fiber which connects fibers of different dispersion                         
          characteristics than the bridge fiber, and not merely “an optical           
          fiber which connects two elements” as asserted by the examiner.             
          In addition, we observe the disclosure of Mukasa (col. 5, lines             





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007