onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Prakash - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > Ex Parte Prakash - Page 1

Sponsored Links




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                            ____________                                               
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                             ____________                                              
                                      Ex parte ANURAG PRAKASH                                          
                                             ____________                                              
                                        Appeal No. 2005-1975                                           
                                    Application No. 09/819,292                                         
                                             ____________                                              
                                               ON BRIEF                                                
                                             ____________                                              
            Before BARRETT, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
            LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                               
            rejection of claims1 1, 4-7, 9, 10, 12-14, 16, 18, 19, 25-27 and             2             
            30-35, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                            


                  We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                   

                  1 An amendment (August 26, 2003) filed subsequent to the final rejection             
            (May 15, 2003), has been denied entry by the examiner (brief, page 2).                     
                  2  The examiner (answer, pages 2 and 3) has withdrawn the rejection of               
            claims 27, 33 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  Accordingly,                 
            only claim 30 remains before us for decision on appeal with respect to 35                  
            U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  As claims 33 and 34 have not been rejected                 
            over prior art, claims 33 and 34 are not before us for decision on appeal.                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007