Ex Parte Yim et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   





                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                    Ex parte KANG SUB YIM, SOOVO SEN,                                          
                                 DIAN SUGIARTO, PETER LEE and ELLIE YIEH                                       
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-2013                                              
                                           Application No. 10/140,324                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before PAK, WATLZ and  JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
             JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 9           
             and 17 to 22, all of the pending claims.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.             











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007