Ex Parte Fukuda et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2005-2035                                                                    Page 7                 
              Application No. 10/281,417                                                                                     



              hydrogen and carbon. Since polyglycol contains oxygen as well as hydrogen and                                  
              carbon, polyglycol is not a hydrocarbon.  Thus, the claimed hydrocarbon-based oil is not                       
              readable on polyglycol when it used as the basic material for the liquid phase of                              
              Lochner's damping medium.                                                                                      


                      Second, there is no motivation, suggestion or incentive in the combined                                
              teachings of Dias and Lochner that would have made it obvious at the time the invention                        
              was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have utilized Lochner's damping                       
              medium based on polyglycol as Dias' liquid 32.  In that regard, Lochner's medium based                         
              on polyglycol and Dias' liquid 32 have distinct uses.  Lochner's medium based on                               
              polyglycol is used for damping while Dias' liquid 32 is used to transmit an ultrasonic                         
              wave.  In addition, Lochner's damping medium based on polyglycol also includes solids                          
              which would wreak havoc in Dias' ultrasound probe.  In our view, the only suggestion for                       
              modifying Dias in the manner proposed by the examiner stems from hindsight                                     
              knowledge derived from the appellants' own disclosure.  The use of such hindsight                              
              knowledge to support an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is, of course,                             
              impermissible.  See, for example, W. L. Gore and Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721                           
              F.2d 1540, 1553, 220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851                             
              (1984).                                                                                                        








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007