Appeal No. 2005-2038
Application No. 09/957,416
multiple hazards would be represented in three-dimensions as well. As
the examiner points out at pages 6 and 7 of the answer, there are
significant teachings of cost function minimization based upon time,
contrary to the views expressed at page 8 of the brief as to the features in
dependent claim 16. No separate arguments are presented as to the
subject matter of independent claim 26 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of examiner rejecting claim 26
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and claims 1 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
sustained. Therefore, the decision of the examiner is affirmed.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007