Ex Parte Kianush et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2005-2151                                                                              
             Application No. 09/822,473                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                      
                   Appellants’ invention relates to a narrow band AM front end receiver.  An                   
             understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,                
             which is reproduced below.                                                                        


                   1. Receiver comprising an RF stage for receiving an antenna signal from                     
                   an inductive antenna, a processing stage for processing the output signals                  
                   of the RF stage and an output for supplying an audio signal, characterized                  
                   in that the RF stage comprises electronically switched capacitors,                          
                   controlled by a switch control circuit, for adjusting front-end selectivity of              
                   the RF stage to correspond to an established tuning frequency.                              

                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the             
             appealed claims are:                                                                              
             MacDonald                       2,148,633                        Feb. 28, 1939                    
             Yasooka Tadashi (Yasooka)       JP 06-125280                     Jun. 5, 1994                     
                   Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and               
             appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answer                  
             (mailed Feb. 24, 2005) for the examiner's reasoning in support of the rejections, and to          
             the brief (filed Dec. 6, 2004) for appellants’ arguments thereagainst.                            






                                                      2                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007