Ex Parte Chen et al - Page 1






                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                   
                               today was not written for publication and is not binding                                   
                               precedent of the Board.                                                                    
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _______________                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   _______________                                                        
                                                 Ex parte HAO A. CHEN                                                     
                                                 and RICHARD JUDD                                                         
                                                    ______________                                                        
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-2175                                                     
                                                 Application 10/104,383                                                   
                                                   _______________                                                        
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                   _______________                                                        
              Before WARREN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
              WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        
                                                   Decision on Appeal                                                     
                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner at least twice             
              rejecting claims 35 and 47 through 69 (see answer, pages 2-3).  Claim 36 is also of record and              
              have been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner under 37 CFR § 1.142(b).                             
                     Claims 35, 67 and 68 illustrate appellants’ invention of a thermoplastic flooring plank,             
              and are representative of the claims on appeal:                                                             
                     35.  A thermoplastic flooring plank comprising:                                                      
                     a core comprising at least one thermoplastic material, wherein said core has a top surface,          
              a bottom surface, and opposing sides;                                                                       
                     a thermoplastic layer located on said top surface of said core wherein said layer                    
              comprises at least one thermoplastic material with at least one pigmented compound, with the                
              proviso that no backing layer is present on the bottom surface of said core.                                
                     67.  A thermoplastic flooring plank comprising:                                                      


                                                       - 1 -                                                              



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007