Ex Parte Jones et al - Page 1




                                                                                                              
                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                ____________                                                   

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                 
                              Ex parte BART R. JONES, EUGENE J. NYKYFORIAK,                                    
                                      DAVID H. BANK, RAVI RAMANATHAN                                           
                                         and DAVID W. RECKTENWALD                                              
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal No. 2005-2180                                             
                                            Application No. 10/051,417                                         
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                 


               Before PAK, WARREN and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
               JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                  


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 7,         
              11 to 14, 18 to 23 and 26 to 32, all of the pending claims.  (Brief, p. 2).  We have             
              jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. ' 134.                                                              
                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                    The present invention relates to a valve cover assembly comprising a valve                 
              cover having a mating surface having a continuous bead of an adhesive disposed on                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007