Ex Parte Orleskie et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2005-2404                                                        
          Application No. 10/119,283                                                  

          element (14) that penetrates into a pipe (12) and has                       
          forward (30B) and downstream (30C) facing pitot tubes that                  
          connect to a sensor body (22) of a transmitter (10) (col. 4,                
          lines 4-13).                                                                
               The examiner argues (answer, pages 6-7):                               
               Wiklund discloses a flow measurement apparatus                         
               comprising a pitot tube type of fluid flow meter having                
               a body that includes upstream and downstream facing                    
               surfaces 30B, 30C for the purpose of measuring pressure                
               across a fixed restriction in a pipe (column 3,                        
               line 35 - column 4, line 3).  Kleven ‘297 and Wiklund                  
               are both from the same field of endeavor, the purpose                  
               disclosed by Wiklund would have been recognized in the                 
               pertinent art of Kleven ‘297.  Therefore, at the time                  
               the invention was made, it would have been obvious to                  
               one of ordinary skill in the art to include in                         
               Kleven ‘297, the teachings of Wiklund, for the purpose                 
               of measuring pressure proximate a fixed restriction in                 
               a pipe.                                                                
               Perhaps, because the devices of both Kleven ‘297 and Wiklund           
          are flow measurement devices, those references would have fairly            
          suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, using the devices           
          together to measure flow.  The examiner, however, has not                   
          explained how those references would have fairly suggested, to              
          one of ordinary skill in the art, the appellants’ pitot tube type           
          flow meter having upstream and downstream facing surfaces carried           



                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007