Ex Parte ISKRA - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-2410                                                                 Page 2                
              Application No. 08/928,272                                                                                 


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                      The present invention relates to a one piece collection container assembly.  The                   
               container comprises a tubular housing having opposed first and second ends and a                          
               solid partition within the housing. (Brief,  p. 2).  Representative claim 1 appears below:                

                      1.  A one piece collection container assembly comprising:                                          
                      an elongated tubular housing having opposed first and second ends; and                             
                      a solid partition positioned within said housing between said first and                            
                      second ends;                                                                                       
                      said housing defining a volume for specimen collection therein between                             
                      said first end and said partition;                                                                 
                      said second end comprising a bottom end below said partition, said                                 
                      bottom end comprising a rounded bottom having an opening therein.                                  
                      The Examiner relies on the following reference in rejecting the appealed claims:                   
               Burns                               5,458,854                                      Oct.  17, 1995         
                      Claims 1, 5, 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Burns; and                       
               claims 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Burns.   (Answer, pp. 3-                      
               5).  We affirm the rejections.                                                                            
                      Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the Examiner and                      
               the Appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the Answer                       
               (mailed September 17, 2003) for the Examiner's reasoning in support of the rejection,                     
               and to the Brief (filed July 7, 2003) for the Appellant’s arguments there against.                        











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007