Ex Parte Siskin et al - Page 5


               Appeal No. 2005-2465                                                                                                  
               Application 10/293,373                                                                                                

               feed is subjected to delayed coking at 50 psig and 900° F, that is, 482°C, to yield more coke than                    
               if the air blowing step is not used.                                                                                  
                       We find that the steps of the process of the British Petroleum Example reasonably appear                      
               to fall within and satisfy each process step specified in appealed claim 1 with the exception of                      
               step “b)” of “heating the oxidized reside feed to a temperature effective for coking said feed,”                      
               which is a pre-heating step to prepare the oxidized reside feed for charging to the delayed coker                     
               drum in step “c),” as pointed out by the examiner.  We agree with the examiner that Hess                              
               acknowledges preheating a feedstock before coking and that such step was known in the art as                          
               we find substantial evidence to support the examiner’s position in the acknowledgement in Hess                        
               that “[i]n the delayed coking process . . . the heavy oil feedstock is heated rapidly in a fired                      
               heater or tubular furnace from which it flows directly to a large coking drum which is maintained                     
               at conditions at which coking occurs” was known in the art (e.g., col. 2, ll. 39-45).  Thus,                          
               contrary to appellants’ arguments, we find that the use of the pre-heating step in a delayed                          
               coking process was within the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art, and this person                          
               would thus have inferred that such a step is included in the delayed coking process of the British                    
               Petroleum Example,3 or would have routinely modified the process of the Example to include                            
               such a step.  See B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Aircraft Braking Sys. Corp., 72 F.3d 1577, 1582, 37                            
               USPQ2d 1314, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (“When obviousness is based on a particular prior art                              
               reference, there must be a showing of a suggestion or motivation to modify the teachings of that                      
               reference. [Citation omitted.] This suggestion or motivation need not be expressly stated.                            
               [Citation omitted.]”).  Indeed, appellants acknowledge that this process step is known as well                        
               (specification, page 1, [0004]).                                                                                      
                       We recognize that British Petroleum is silent with respect to whether the amount of one                       
               or more of asphaltenes, polars, and organically bound oxygen groups in the oxidized resid is                          
               increased.  We find in this respect that the process of the reference Example increased the                           
               Conradson carbon reside value (see page 1, ll. 53-61), and thus, one of ordinary skill in the art                     
                                                                                                                                    
               3  It is well settled that a reference stands for all of the specific teachings thereof as well as the                
               inferences one of ordinary skill in this art would have reasonably been expected to draw                              
               therefrom, see In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1264-65, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1782-83 (Fed. Cir.                               


                                                                - 5 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007