Ex Parte Tabata - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2005-2488                                                              
          Application No. 10/150,497                                                        

          (the claimed cylindrical trunk) and the window (the claimed thin                  
          film section) of an infrared clinical thermometer probe, which                    
          can be made from the same plastic or resin materials, such as                     
          polyethylene and polypropylene.  See O’Hara, column 4, lines                      
          48-53 and column 5, lines 12-15 and 35-40.                                        
                The dispositive question is, therefore, whether the examiner                
          has correctly determined that Beerworth teaches “the cylindrical                  
          trunk section and the thin film section [which] are integrally                    
          molded by the same resin material such that the outer peripheral                  
          surfaces of the cylindrical trunk section and the thin film                       
          section are smoothly connected to each other (emphasis ours)” as                  
          recited in claim 1.2  On this record, we answer this question in                  
          the negative.                                                                     
                According to page 5 of the specification, the phrase “‘outer                
          peripheral surfaces are smoothly connected to each other’ means                   
          that a step or a seam is not formed in the connection portion                     
          between the outer peripheral surface of the trunk section and the                 
          outer peripheral surface of the thin film section.”  Moreover, in                 
          reference to Figure 4 which shows a single piece structure                        
          defining cylindrical trunk and thin film sections (without any                    

                2 The examiner relies on the disclosure of Meyst to show                    
          only the features recited in claims 3 and 4.                                      
                                             4                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007