Ex Parte Menon et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2529                                                        
          Application No. 10/154,140                                                  

               an end cap coupled to a second end of said sleeve; and                 
               a bias member operatively associated with said bias member             
          retainer housing and said end cap for biasing said bias member              
          retainer housing away from said end cap and absorbing energy                
          during impact of said end cap,                                              
               wherein said bias member retainer housing is adapted to                
          prevent said bias member from entering said cavity when a force             
          insufficient to cause compressive failure of rubber is applied to           
          said bias member retaining housing, and is adapted to permit said           
          bias member to enter said cavity when a force minimally                     
          sufficient to cause compressive failure of rubber is applied to             
          said bias member retaining housing.                                         
               The examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence           
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Fenton                       627,227                June 20, 1899           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a handlebar               
          safety device comprising a bias member that enters the cavity of            
          the handlebar when a force sufficient to cause a traumatic                  
          abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) in a human being is applied to the             
          housing retaining the bias member.  The retainer housing can be             
          made of plastic or rubber.                                                  
               Appealed claims 13-15, 17-20, 22, 24-26 and 28 stand                   
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.  Claims 1, 3,             
          4, 6, 8-10, 12-15, 17, 19, 20, 22-26, 28 and 30 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fenton.                 
               Appellants have not separately grouped nor offered separate            
          arguments for the claims on appeal.  Accordingly, the appealed              
                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007