Ex Parte Keegan et al - Page 4


               Appeal No. 2005-2567                                                                                                  
               Application 10/032,606                                                                                                

               by the terms of the appealed claims was reasonable.”); see also In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708-                       
               09, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657-58 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (“The Board held that the compositions claimed                           
               by Spada ‘appear to be identical’ to those described by Smith. While Spada criticizes the usage                       
               of the word ‘appear,’ we think that it was reasonable for the PTO to infer that the polymerization                    
               by both Smith and Spada of identical monomers, employing the same or similar polymerization                           
               techniques, would produce polymers having the identical composition.”).                                               
                       Accordingly, on this record, we reverse the grounds of rejection of appealed claim 2.                         

























                       The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                                                          
                                                             Reversed                                                                




                                                                - 4 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007