Interference No. 105,128 Paper 104
Scripps Research Inst. v. Nemerson Page 2
FURTHER DECIDED that Nemerson's 08/473,262 application claims 33 and 34
be held unpatentable;
FURTHER DECIDED that Nemerson's 08/297,581 application claims 15, 45, and
47 be held unpatentable;
FURTHER DECIDED that Nemerson's amendment of 08/473,262 application
claim 36 (Paper 101) be entered into the record of the 08/473,262 application; and
FURTHER DECIDED that a copy of this judgment be entered in the
administrative records of Nemerson's 08/297,581 and 08/473,262 applications and
Scripps' 5,622,931 patent.
cc (via electronic mail):
For Scripps Research Institute: Talivaldis Cepuritis and Dolores T. Kenney, OLSON &
HIERL, LTD. of Chicago, Illinois.
For Nemerson: Patrea L. Pabst, PABST PATENT GROUP LLP of Atlanta, Georgia.
Notice: Agreements and understandings regarding the termination of an interference
are subject to filing requirements under 35 U.S.C. 135(c).
Notice: In the event of judicial review, note the requirements of Bd. R. 8(b).
Page: Previous 1 2
Last modified: November 3, 2007