|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
BENSON et al. V. BENSON et al. V. BENSON et al. V. GINTER et al. - Page 1Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > BENSON et al. V. BENSON et al. V. BENSON et al. V. GINTER et al. - Page 1 Sponsored Links
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
AND IS NOT BINDING PRECEDENT OF THE BOARD
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Paper No. 320
Mail Stop INTERFERENCE Entered: December 28, 2005
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, USPTO
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797 Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
KARL L. GINTER, VICTOR H. SHEAR, FRANCES J. SPAHN, and DAVID M. VAN WIE,
Junior Party
(Application 09/411,205)
v.
GREG BENSON, GREGORY H. URICH, and CHRISTOPHER L. KNAUFT
(Patent 5,845,281; Applications 09/164,606 and 09/321,286)
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,142
_______________
MARTIN, LEE, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
PER CURIAM.
JUDGMENT – Bd. Rule 127
For the reasons given in the “Decision on Priority” entered herewith, it is hereby
ORDERED that judgment on the issue of priority is entered against party KARL L.
GINTER, VICTOR H. SHEAR, FRANCES J. SPAHN, and DAVID M. VAN WIE as to each of
Counts 1, 2, and 4;
|