Yang et al. V. Moore et al. - Page 2






              unpatentable. Accordingly, a count cannot be formulated,                   
              and it is inappropriate to continue to the priority phase of               
              this interference. Therefore, it is:                                       
                   ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count               
              1 (Paper 1, p. 5) is awarded against both parties;                         
                   FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, SHUNONG YANG,                      
              WILLIAM F. McCOY, and ANTHONY W. DALLMIER is not entitled to               
              a patent containing Claims 1-13 of patent 6,287,473;                       
                   FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, ROBERT M. MOORE and                
              CHRISTOPHER J. NALEPA is not entitled to a patent containing               
              Claims 6-10 of application 09/785,890;                                     
                   FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of               
              record in the files of application 09/785,890 and patent                   
              6,287,473; and                                                             
                   FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement                       
              agreement which has not been filed, the parties shall direct               
              attention to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR 41.205.                         


                             /Richard E. Schafer/                                        
                             RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                          
                             Administrative Patent Judge                                 
                             /Romulo H. Delmendo/ BOARD OF PATENT                        
                             ROMULO H. DELMENDO                                          
                             Administrative Patent Judge APPEALS AND                     
                             /James T. Moore/ INTERFERENCES                              
                             JAMES T. MOORE                                              
                             Administrative Patent Judge                                 



                                           2                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007