Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1 at 4) and Count 2
(Paper 1 at 5) is awarded against senior party JEAN E. HARPER.
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party JEAN E. HARPER is not entitled to a
patent containing claims 48-51 (corresponding to Count 1) or claims 52-54 (corresponding to
Count 2) of 09/890,289.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files
of application 09/890,289 and U.S. Patent 6,310,090.
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is
directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205.
/ss/ Richard E. Schafer )
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
/ss/ Sally C. Medley )BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY C. MEDLEY ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/ss/ James T. Moore )
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007