|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Ex Parte YAMANAKA et al - Page 1Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > Ex Parte YAMANAKA et al - Page 1 Sponsored Links
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MASAAKI YAMANAKA,
HIROSHI KOYAMA and YASUHIRO UEDA
______________
Appeal No. 2005-2639
Application 08/855,905
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
On Request For Rehearing
This is a request for rehearing under 37 CFR § 41.52 (2005). Requests for rehearing
must comply with 37 CFR § 41.52(a)(1) (2005) which specifies that “[t]he request for rehearing
must state with particularity the points believed to have been misapprehended or overlooked by
the Board.” See also Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1214.03 (8th ed., Rev. 3,
August 2005).
Appellants request rehearing of our decision entered December 16, 2005, affirming the
examiner’s rejection of appealed claims 1 and 28 through 49 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Takashi in view of Ohba and Ueda (request, page 1). Appellants contend
(1) that we failed to consider a three-layered synthetic paper specifically encompassed by
appealed claim 47 and thus, improperly dismissed the experiments performed in the Yamanaka
- 1 -
|