Interference No. 105,286
Stearns v. Anderson
Junior party Stearns’ Substantive Motion 2 for priority has been granted (Paper No. 71).
Accordingly, it is now time appropriate to enter judgment against the senior party.
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against
senior party CHRISTOPHER S. ANDERSON, LOIS J. FALCONE, ARTHUR L. TORRENCE,
GARY A. CIECIUCE, ANTHONY C. SQUITIERI and DONNA M. STEARNS;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party CHRISTOPHER S. ANDERSON, LOIS J.
FALCONE, ARTHUR L. TORRENCE, GARY A. CIECIUCE, ANTHONY C. SQUITIERI and
DONNA M. STEARNS is not entitled to its involved reissue patent claims 1-9;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007