Grubbs et al. V. Herrmann et al. V. Herrmann et al. - Page 2

            Interference 105,364 and 105,365                   Paper 74             
            Grubbs v. Herrmann                                                      
                 In view of the DECISION — Interlocutory Motions                    
            Bd.R. 125(b) (Paper 72) and the REDECLARATION — Bd.R. 203               
            (Paper 73), it is:                                                      
                      ORDERED that adverse judgment as to priority is               
        5   entered against Grubbs.                                                 
                      FURTHER ORDERED that Robert H. Grubbs and Tina M.             
            Trnka are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1—35               
            of U.S. Patent 6,426,419.                                               
                      FURTHER ORDERED that Robert H. Grubbs and Tina M.             
       10   Trnka are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1—20               
            of U.S. Patent 6,624,265.                                               
                      FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Decision                  
            shall be placed in the files of U.S. Patent 6,426,419                   
            B1, U.S. Patent 6,624,265 B1, U.S. Application                          
       15   10/630,552, and U.S. Application 11/021,967.                            













                                        -2-                                         


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007