ANDERSON et al. V. YU et al. - Page 2




               Interference No. 105,371                                                                      Page 2                 
           1                                               JUDGMENT                                                                 
           2           ORDERED that judgment be entered against junior party Yu for the subject matter of                           
           3 count 1, the sole count;                                                                                               
           4           FURTHER ORDERED that Yu claims 2, 5, 13, and 16 be cancelled; and                                            
           5           FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the administrative                                
           6 records of the involved patent and application.                                                                        
               cc:                                                                                                                  
               For Yu and Van Scott: Robert M. Schulman, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, of Washington, D.C.,                                
                       with Patrick A. Doody, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, of McLean, Virginia, and Eugene                                
                       Rzucidlo, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP,  of New York City, New York.                                                
               For Neose Technologies, Inc.: Todd Esker and Jeffry Mann, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUSLLP,                                
                       San Francisco, California.                                                                                   





















               Notice: Agreements and understandings regarding the termination of an interference are subject                       
               to filing requirements under 35 U.S.C. 135(c).                                                                       
               Notice: In the event of judicial review, note the requirements of Bd. R. 8(b).                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2

Last modified: November 3, 2007