Ex Parte POKORZYNSKI et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-1176                                                         
          Application No. 09/074,288                                                   

               molded foam material bonding said skin material to                      
               said porous substrate, whereby said porous substrate                    
               is held to a backside of the trim member that is                        
               opposite of the upholstery skin material.                               
                    2. The interior trim piece as defined in                           
               Claim 1, wherein said substrate comprises a porous                      
               fiberous [sic] material having openings therein,                        
               wherein said moldable foam material penetrates said                     
               openings and bonds to said porous material through                      
               said openings.                                                          
               In our original decision, we affirmed the examiner’s                    
          decision to reject the claims on all three grounds.  (Original               
          decision at 3.)  Specifically, we affirmed the examiner’s                    
          rejections under:                                                            
               A. 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) of appealed claims 1 through 4 and                
                    6 through 10 as anticipated by United States patent                
                    5,082,609 issued to Rohrlach et al. (Rohrlach) on                  
                    January 21, 1992;                                                  
               B. 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) of appealed claims 1 through 4 and                
                    6 through 10 as anticipated by United States patent                
                    5,180,617 issued to Takeuchi et al. (Takeuchi) on                  
                    January 19, 1993; and                                              
               C. 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of appealed claims 1 through 4 and                
                    6 through 10 as unpatentable over Takeuchi.                        
               With respect to Rohrlach, we found (original decision at                
          5):                                                                          

                                          3                                            


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007