Ex Parte BIEMAN - Page 7




                  Appeal No. 2004-0659                                                                                           
                  Application No. 09/111,978                                                                                     

                                  22.    The examiner found that Kuchel describes “a method for non-                             
                  contact measuring of [an] object surface.”                                                                     
                                  23.    However, the examiner found that “Kuchel does not teach the step                        
                  of moving the object relative to [a] projector.”                                                               
                                  24.    The examiner further found that Bullock shows, in the same field                        
                  of endeavor, moving the object while measuring its shape.                                                      
                                  25.    The examiner noted:                                                                     
                                  Kuchel discloses a method and apparatus for non-contact measuring of                           
                          object surface in which the gratings (G1 and G2) are moving and the measured                           
                          object is fixed. Kuchel does not teach the step of moving the object relative to the                   
                          at least one projector at the vision station to scan the projected pattern of                          
                          electromagnetic radiation across a surface of the object; however, such a feature is                   
                          known in the art, for example as taught by Bullock et al.  Bullock et al, in the                       
                          same field of endeavor, discloses a method and apparatus for measuring the shape                       
                          of a surface of an object in which the steel strip 1 is moving in direction A over                     
                          support surface 2, an array of line-scan cameras (5) positioned to view and record                     
                          the light patterns and to process in parallel data representative of the recorded                      
                          light patterns to provide a measure of the shape of the object surface (figures 1-3).                  
                                  26.    The examiner held that:                                                                 
                                  Those of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made                          
                          would have found it obvious to move the object taught by Bullock et a1 instead of                      
                          moving the grating because they would function in the same manner. A                                   
                          substitution for each other is generally recognized as being within the level of                       
                          ordinary skill in the art.                                                                             
                                  27.    In due course, Applicant filed an amendment responding to the                           
                  examiner's first Office action.                                                                                
                                  28.    In the amendment, Applicant amended claims 1 and 14, as shown                           
                  below.                                                                                                         
                                  29.    Claim 1 as amended read as follows ([brackets] indicate a deletion                      
                  from the claim by Applicant, underline indicates an insertion into the claim by                                
                  Applicant):                                                                                                    

                                                              - 7 -                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007