Ex Parte Moon et al - Page 1





               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                   ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                    
                          Ex parte JAE-HO MOON, DAE-SOON LIM, and O-HYUN BAEK                                      
                                                   ____________                                                    
                                                Appeal No. 2005-0247                                               
                                             Application No. 10/171,657                                            
                                                   ____________                                                    
                                                HEARD: May 4, 2005                                                 
                                                   ____________                                                    
             Before KRASS, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   



                                   DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                               
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1-27.  The appellants appealed.  We affirmed.                
              Ex parte Moon, No. 2005-0247 (Bd.Pat.App. & Int. May 31, 2005).  The appellants now                  
             asks us to reconsider our affirmance of the examiner's rejections.  (Req. Reh'g1 at 1.)               



                                                                                                                   
                    1The appellants cite 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)(2)(2005), (Req. Reh'g at 1), which                   
             allows an appellant to request a rehearing when the Board has entered a new ground of                 
             rejection.  Here, because we entered no such new ground, the request under                            
             § 41.50(b)(2) is improper.  In the interest of economy, however, we treat the request as              
             if it was made under 37 C.F.R. § 41.52(a)(1).                                                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007