Ex Parte Apps et al - Page 14



         Appeal 2005-0801                                                                                       
         Application 09/848,628                                                                                 

                             at least [one] catch member [80] opposite said at least one L                      
                                    shaped retainer member [79] to releasably retain said                       
                                    hood [54] to said lid [40],                                                 
                       said lid vent hole [72] including:                                                       
                             a generally horizontal hood portion [76];                                          
                             a sidewardly facing opening [77] in said hood [54] with respect                    
                                    to falling rain by said hood portion; and                                   
                             a perforated plate [78] covering said sidewardly facing opening                    
                             [77].                                                                              
                             45.  Additionally, the amendment cancelled allowable claim 6                       
                and rewrote it as new independent claim 21.                                                     
                             46. With respect to new claim 21, applicant stated as follows:                     
                       New claim 21 includes the limitations of claims 1, 2, 4, and 6 as                        
                       originally submitted.  (Res. to first action 4)                                          
                             47. With respect to amended claim 1 (combining originally                          
                filed claims 1 and 2), applicant stated as follows (emphasis added):                            
                       What the Examiner failed to recognize is that KUELMICHEL                                 
                       is a liquid collection container that is not supposed to vent any                        
                       fumes …  Applicant’s therefore do not understand the                                     
                       Examiner’s position that it would be obvious to combine a side                           
                       vented trash cart like GEHR with … a container designed to                               
                       “allow waste to drain under any surface scum and not release                             
                       fumes” [like KUELMICHEL] as stated in the English abstract,                              
                       to make obvious a trash cart that allows fumes (water [vapor])                           
                       to escape out its vented lid. (Res. to first action, page 5)                             
                             48. With respect to amended claim 3, applicant stated as                           
                follows (emphasis added):                                                                       
                       The Examiner states that KUELMICHEL teaches a hinge or                                   
                       retainer which is L-shaped, as broadly recited and interpreted,                          
                                                      14                                                        




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007