Ex Parte BLECKMANN et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No.  2005-1742                                                          Page 2                    
                 Application No.  09/436,171                                                                              

                 additionally comprising at least one cationic polymer, wherein said at least one                         
                 cationic polymer is selected from the group consisting of cationic cellulose                             
                 derivatized with a quaternary ammonium salt, cationic starch, copolymers of                              
                 diallylammonium salts and acrylamides, quaternized                                                       
                 vinylpyrrolidone/vinylimadazole polymers, condensation products of a polyglycol                          
                 with an amine, quaternized collagen polypeptides, quaternized wheat                                      
                 polypeptides, polyethyleneimine, cationic silicone polymers, copolymers of adipic                        
                 acid with dimethylaminohydroxypropyldiethlenetriamine, copolymers of acrylic                             
                 acid with dimethyldiallylammonium chloride, polyaminopolyamides, and cationic                            
                 guar gum.”                                                                                               
                         The examiner relies upon the following references:                                               
                 Yoneyama et al. (Yoneyama)  5,015,469  May 14, 1991                                                      
                 Dupuis et al. (Dupuis)   6,338,858  Jan.  15, 2002                                                       
                 Schreiber et al. (Schreiber I)  6,613,338  Sep.  2, 2003                                                 
                 Schreiber et al. (Schreiber II)1  WO 98/17232 Apr. 30, 1998                                              
                         Claims 1, 3, 5, 7-9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                            
                 being obvious over the combination of Schreiber II and Dupuis.  In addition, claim                       
                 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the                                
                 combination of Schreiber II and Dupuis as further combined with Yoneyama.                                




                                                                                                                         
                 1 Note that Schreiber I is apparently the English equivalent of the Schreiber II reference, see          
                 Examiner’s Answer, page 3,and Schreiber I does claim priority to the Schreiber II reference.             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007