Ex Parte BALDWIN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2005-1995                                                         
          Application 09/133,741                                                       

                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to method for clipping which uses a               
          circular buffer instead of two separate buffers which are ping-              
          ponged between (specification, pages 11-13).                                 
               Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                            
               1. A method for clipping graphics primitives for display,               
               comprising the steps of:                                                
               performing a clipping algorithm which uses only a single                
                    circular buffer to store input and output vertices of a            
                    primitive; and                                                     
               for each one of said vertices, indicating whether said one              
                    of said vertices is visible with respect to each plane             
                    of a view volume.                                                  

                                    THE REFERENCES                                     
               The examiner relies on the following references:                        
               Watkins et al. (Watkins)   5,361,386     November 1, 1994               
               Narayanaswami              5,613,052       March 18, 1997               
               Rossin et al. (Rossin)     5,877,773        March 2, 1999               
          (filed May 30, 1997)                                                         
               Ivan E. Sutherland, Micropipelines, Communications of the               
               ACM, Volume 32, Number 6, pp. 720-738, June 1989.                       

                                    THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 2, 7-11, 14, 15, 48, 50, and 51 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rossin and               
          Sutherland.                                                                  
               Claims 16, 17, 20-24, 26, 27, and 47 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rossin and                     
          Sutherland, further in view of Watkins.                                      
                                        - 2 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007