Appeal No. 2005-2282 Page 4
Application No. 09/505,807
II. OPINION
Our opinion addresses the rejections in the following order:
• claims 1, 7, 9-16, 19, 21-23, and 26.
• claim 3
• claims 4-6, 17, 18, 24, and 25
• claims 8, 20, and 27.
A. CLAIMS 1, 7, 9-16, 19, 21-23, AND 26
"[T]o assure separate review by the Board of individual claims within each group
of claims subject to a common ground of rejection, an appellant's brief to the Board
must contain a clear statement for each rejection: (a) asserting that the patentability of
claims within the group of claims subject to this rejection do not stand or fall together,
and (b) identifying which individual claim or claims within the group are separately
patentable and the reasons why the examiner's rejection should not be sustained."
In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d 1379, 1383, 63 USPQ2d 1462, 1465 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (citing
37 C.F.R. §1.192(c)(7)). "If the brief fails to meet either requirement, the Board is free
to select a single claim from each group of claims subject to a common ground of
rejection as representative of all claims in that group and to decide the appeal of that
rejection based solely on the selected representative claim." Id., 63 USPQ2d at 1465.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007