Ex Parte Olson et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2005-2330                                                         
          Application No. 10/026,123                                                   

                                      PRIOR ART                                        
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in                 
          support of the Section 103 rejections before us are:                         
          Roessler et al. (Roessler)    5,399,219            Mar. 21, 1995             
          Schmitz                       5,779,831            Jul. 14, 1998             
          Widlund et al. (Widlund)      6,210,388 B1         Apr. 3, 2001              
                                              (Published Oct. 19, 1995)                
          Fletcher et al. (Fletcher)    WO 00/37009          Jun. 29, 2000             
          (Published International Application)3                                       
          Johansson et al. (Johansson) 2 303 045 A           Feb. 12, 19974            
          (Published UK Patent Application)                                            
                                                                                      
                                     REJECTIONS                                        
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                          
          1.   Claims 1 through 3, 5, 7, 11 through 14 and 20 under                    
               35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined                       
               disclosures of Schmitz and Widlund;                                     

               3 In reference to this published foreign document                       
          (Fletcher), we provide its publication number and date, rather               
          than the unpublished international application number                        
          “PCT/US99/29704" (a designation which is given to a PCT                      
          application prior to its publication date) and incorrect filing              
          date supplied by the examiner at page 3 of the Answer.                       
               4  In reference to this published foreign document                      
          (Johansson), we provide its publication date since such date (not            
          the filing date supplied by the examiner) is relevant to its                 
          prior art status.  The examiner mentions the filing date of this             
          published foreign patent application at page 3 of the Answer.                
                                          4                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007