The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HERVE VISAGE, DANIEL LE GUILLANT, ARNAUD CAMUS
and HERVE COSTALUNGA
____________
Appeal No. 2005-2335
Application No. 10/333,711
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 24, 2006
____________
Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 9 and
13. Claims 2-8, 10-12 and 14 stand objected to as depending from a rejected base
claim but are otherwise indicated as allowable.
BACKGROUND
The appellants’ invention relates to an antivibration support for interposing
between first and second rigid elements in order to damp vibration between said two
elements. Claim 1 is representative of the invention and is reproduced in the appendix
to appellants’ brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007