Ex Parte Umeda et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-2408                                                                Παγε 2                
              Application No. 09/783,548                                                                                


                     The appellants’ invention relates to a mask that supplies steam to the nose and                    
              throat  (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims 1, 2, 6 to 14 under appeal is set forth in           
              the appendix to the appellants’ brief.   The copy of claim 15 contained in the appendix                   
              does not include amendments to that claim made in a reply to the Final Office Action.                     
              Claim 15 recites:                                                                                         
                     A mask comprising:                                                                                 
                     a main mask body; and                                                                              
                     heat generating means for generating steam in said main mask body by an                            
              exothermic oxidation chemical reaction, wherein said steam generates a therapeutic                        
              vapor for inhalation.                                                                                     
                                                  THE PRIOR ART                                                         
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Daneshvar     5,205,282   Apr. 27, 1993                                                                   
              Mitra et al. (Mitra)    5,890,486   Apr.   6, 1999                                                        
                                                  THE REJECTION                                                         
                     Claims 1, 6, 8, 9, and 11 to 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
              unpatentable over Daneshvar in view of Mitra.                                                             














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007