Ex Parte Seth - Page 10




              Appeal No. 2006-0139                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/583,228                                                                                
              by appellant.  In view of the above, the rejection of the claims for obviousness in view of               
              Morella is affirmed.                                                                                      
                                                    CONCLUSION                                                          
                     The rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 9-14, 19-22 and 24-50 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                     
              over Morella is affirmed.                                                                                 
                     No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal                     
              may be extended under 37 CFR ' 1.136(a).                                                                  


                                                     AFFIRMED                                                           

                                                                             )                                          
                                   Toni R. Scheiner    )                                                                
                                   Administrative Patent Judge  )                                                       
                                                                             )                                          
                                                                             )                                          
                                                                             ) BOARD OF PATENT                          
                                   Demetra J. Mills    )                                                                
                                   Administrative Patent Judge  )   APPEALS AND                                         
                                                                             )                                          
                                                                             ) INTERFERENCES                            
                                                                             )                                          
                                   Eric Grimes     )                                                                    
                                   Administrative Patent Judge  )                                                       









                                                          10                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007