Ex Parte Beek et al - Page 5


             Appeal No. 2006-0151                                                              Page 5                
             Application No. 09/753,381                                                                              

                    The specification also describes specific experiments in which two commercially                  
             available lecithin/lysolecithin surfactants, Lysoprin and Bolec MT (each of which contains              
             approximately 33% lysophospholipids), were added to animal feed containing various                      
             exogenous enzymes (id., page 4).  Tables 1 and 2 of the specification show the results                  
             obtained when “feed samples [were] treated with enzyme products and combinations of                     
             enzyme products with lysophospholipid/phospholipid type (LPC/PC-type) [ ] surfactants”                  
             (id., page 9).  In certain cases, the “LPC/PC-type” surfactants contained 16% Lysoprin                  
             (S2) or 16% Bolec MT (S3) (id., Table 1, note 3; Table 2, notes 1 and 3).  Thus the S2                  
             and S3 surfactants, as used in the experiments, contained approximately 5%                              
             lysophospholipids.  In addition, according to the specification, the data in Table 2 indicate           
             that “further improvements can be achieved by choosing the best LPC/LP-type of                          
             surfactant, which in this case is the fully converted product, S4” (Specification, page 10).            
             S4 is yet another surfactant described in U.S. Patent No. 6,068,997 “containing approx.                 
             16% lysolecithin . . . by weight” (Specification, Table 2, note 5).                                     
                    Finally, as pointed out by appellants, Table 2 shows, among other things, that                   
             “degradation of neutral detergent fiber [(NDF)] by the exogenous enzyme ENZ-Xylanase                    
             at 250 Kg/T and the surfactant Tween (not a converted lecithin) resulted in an NDF                      
             degradation of 2.89%, whereas the ENZ-Xylanase at 250 Kg/T combined with . . . the                      
             surfactant S4 (a lysolecithin) resulted in an NDF degradation of 10.72%” (Reply Brief,                  
             page 4).  Table 2 also shows that “NDF degradation by . . . the exogenous enzyme ENZ-                   
             Barley at a level of 500 Kg/T was 5.10% and [ ] NDF degradation by . . . ENZ-Barley at a                
             level of 250 Kg/T with the addition of surfactant S2 (a lysolecithin) resulted in the same              
             5.10%” (id.).                                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007