Appeal No. 2006-0167
Application No. 10/186,263
In summary, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 10,
14 through 23 and 27under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). However, we will not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claims 11 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). The decision
of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROBERT E. NAPPI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
REN/gjh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007