Ex Parte ANDERSSON et al - Page 5




               Appeal No. 2006-0274                                                                                                  
               Application No. 09/415,890                                                                                            
                       In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner bears the initial burden                              
               of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.  See In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531,                                   
               1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993).   A prima facie case of obviousness is                                   
               established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested                               
               the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art.  In re Bell, 991 F.2d                            
               781, 783, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  An obviousness analysis requires                                    
               that the prior art both suggest the claimed subject matter and reveal a reasonable                                    
               expectation of success to one reasonably skilled in the art.   In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488,                             
               493, 20 USPQ2d 1438, 1442  (Fed. Cir. 1991).    With this as background, we analyze                                   
               the prior art applied by the examiner in the rejection of the claims on appeal.                                       
                       It is the examiner’s position that (Answer, page 6)                                                           
                               Janoff teaches the instant invention, but uses solvents such as                                       
                       DMSO (col. 4, lines 49-50).  Szoka discloses such solvents to include the                                     
                       instantly claimed DMF (col. 4, line 50, col. 5, lines 8-13), also used with                                   
                       co-solvents and the Janoff instant antibiotics: amphotericin, pimaricin  (col.                                
                       3, bottom).                                                                                                   
                       It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the                                    
                       time the invention was made, desiring to prepare stable hydrophobic                                           
                       antibiotic solvent vehicles, to prepare one of Janoff.  The particular solvent                                
                       is seen as one within the purview of the artisan to select, as equivalents                                    
                       taught by Szoka.                                                                                              

               The examiner further argues (Answer, page 7)                                                                          
                               Appellants arguments re Szoka are that no prima facie obviousness                                     
                       is shown, however both references show a variety of solvents, and Janoff                                      
                       states that the solvent is chosen as to maximize solution of the particular                                   
                       drug, provide biocompatability and reduce toxicity and flammobility [sic]                                     
                       (col.10, lines 10-13). Szoka’s expanded list of solvents is shown to include                                  
                       Janoff’s DMSO and alcohols, and DMA (co1.4, lines 46-61). Szoka utilizes                                      
                       these solvents with lipid particles and the instant polyene antibiotics,                                      
                                                                 5                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007