Ex Parte Chien et al - Page 1




                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                  
                     written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  



                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                          
                     Ex parte TING CHIEN, CHRISTINE NELSON, and DOUGLAS KEIL                                             
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                              Appeal No. 2006-0291                                                       
                                         Application No. 09/820,692                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                   ____________                                                          
              Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                             
              Judges.                                                                                                    
              WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                         
                     This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of                      
              claims 1 through 4, 7 through 12, and 14 through 27, which are all of the claims pending                   
              in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                    
                     According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method of etching a                         
              dielectric layer with selectivity to an underlying stop layer comprising supporting a                      
              semiconductor substrate in a plasma etch chamber of a dual frequency capacitively                          
              coupled plasma reactor having a powered showerhead electrode and/or a powered                              
              bottom electrode, where an etchant gas comprising a hydrogen-free fluorocarbon gas                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007