Ex Parte Corriveau et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                        
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                 



                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                            
                                                    ____________                                                                               

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                             
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                
                                                      ____________                                                                             
                   Ex parte CHRISTINE LECLAIR CORRIVEAU, GWENDOLYN JEANNE GRAFF,                                                               
                                  DANIEL J. ZYCK, and ALBERT H. CHAPDELAINE                                                                    
                                                     ____________                                                                              
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-0356                                                                          
                                               Application No. 10/228,742                                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                                              
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                                                
                                                     ____________                                                                              
              Before CAROFF, KIMLIN, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
              CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                             



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                              
                     Appellants’ appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-92, all of the                                         
              claims pending in appellants’ application.                                                                                       
                     The appealed claims are directed to a rolled edible thin film product and a method                                        
              of making that product.  The rolled edible thin film may be placed in a container, and may                                       
              be designed to be segmented by a consumer into a plurality of pieces.  Claim 1 is                                                
              representative:                                                                                                                  
















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007