Ex Parte Liberman - Page 3


              Appeal No. 2006-0449                                                                                     
              Application 10/232,644                                                                                   

              skill in the art in light of the written description in the specification unless another meaning is      
              intended by appellant as established in the written description of the specification, and without        
              reading into the claims any limitation or particular embodiment disclosed in the specification.          
              See, e.g., In re Am. Acad. of Sci. Tech. Ctr., 367 F.3d 1359, 1364, 70 USPQ2d 1827, 1830 (Fed.           
              Cir. 2004); In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re           
              Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321-22, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989).  The plain language of               
              independent claim 1 specifies a method comprising at least the steps of combining any “meat”             
              and any “marinade” in a bag and then vacuum sealing the “bag without allowing any substantial            
              time for marination,” at an unspecified later time, immersing the vacuum sealed bad in a brine           
              solution containing between 0.05% and 1.0% by weight of any cruciferous oil, and freezing said           
              meat in the vacuum sealed bag in the brine solution at a temperature between –22 and -43.6°F,            
              that is, –30.0 to –42.0°C, such that “said meat can be properly marinated in the same amount of          
              time as fresh meat placed in said marinade.”  Thus, in the context of the language of this claim,        
              the “time for marination” is the “same amount of time” that any “fresh” “said meat” “placed in”          
              any “said marinade” “can be properly marinated” in the estimation of any chef or consumer, and           
              therefore, the bag with the combined meat and marinade must be vacuum sealed “without                    
              allowing any substantial time for” “properly” marinating the meat with the marinade.                     
                     The plain language of independent claim 13 specifies a method comprising at least the             
              method steps specified in appealed claim 1, but does not include the “properly marinated in the          
              same amount of time” clause, and adds the additional steps of “thawing said meat and said                
              marinade” and then “marinating said meat in said marinade prior to cooking.”  Thus, claim 13             
              does not limit the “time for marination” in any respect.                                                 
                     Each of independent claims 1 and 13 simply requires combining any “meat” and any                  
              “marinade” in a bag and then vacuum sealing the “bag without allowing any substantial time for           
              marination,” followed at any later time by the step of immersing the vacuum sealed bad in a              
              specified brine solution, and thus, does not limit marination time of the meat subsequent to             
              sealing the bag and prior to freezing the bag.                                                           
                     Claims 3 and 15 further limit claims 1 and 13, on which they respectively depend, by              
              requiring that the “meat is frozen without allowing any substantial time for marination after            
              vacuum sealing.”  The subject phrase taken with the requirement to vacuum seal the “bag                  

                                                         - 3 -                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007