Ex Parte Ilg et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0472                                                        
          Application No. 10/859,119                                                  

          specification, page 1.  Details of the appealed subject matter              
          are recited in representative claim 14 which is reproduced below:           
                    14. A system for making yarns of bulked continuous                
               nylon filaments comprising:                                            
                    a spinning head for melt-spinning a nylon material                
               to form multiple filaments thereof;                                    
                    a draw zone downstream of said spin head for                      
               drawing the melt-spun nylon filaments; and                             
                    a texturing unit downstream of the draw zone for                  
               texturing the melt-spun, drawn nylon filaments; wherein                
                    the texturing unit includes means for directing a                 
               fluid jet onto the nylon filaments of the BCF at a                     
               sufficiently low fluid jet velocity and at a                           
               sufficiently high fluid jet temperature to impart an                   
               alpha-crystalline content in the BCF of at least about                 
               45% and to obtain a yarn skein shrinkage of less than                  
               about 0.50 inch.                                                       
                                      PRIOR ART                                       
               The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner in            
          support of the Section 102(b) rejection before us is:                       
          Chuah                         6,113,825           Sep. 5, 2000              
                                                                                     
                                     REJECTIONS                                       
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                         
          1.   Claims 14 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,           
               as failing provide an enabling disclosure for the presently            
               claimed subject matter; and                                            
          2.   Claims 14 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated           
               by the disclosure of Chuah.                                            
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007