Ex Parte Macheel et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         




                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                        

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                     Ex parte Douglas M. Macheel and Lee B. Max                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-0562                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/952,588                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 39-52                   
              and 55-57, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                       


                     We AFFIRM.                                                                                         










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007